Your body is alive with information. Every moment, it is in communication with its surroundings, coordinating the activity of trillions of cells, and regulating itself. Signals of all sorts are constantly being sent and received along many different channels — each with its characteristic rhythms and frequencies. Bioresonance rests on the idea that it is possible to interface with the body on this informational level — both to learn something useful about its state and, potentially, to support its regulation.

Electrical signalling is familiar to us — neurons conducting impulses in the brain come readily to mind. But the body’s electrical dimension goes far deeper than nerve signals. Researchers from the Nobel laureate Albert Szent-Györgyi, who established the field of bioelectronics, to the regeneration pioneer Robert O. Becker illustrated that electrical activity is foundational to life itself. More recently, the biologist Michael Levin has shown that bioelectric signals — patterns of voltage across networks of cells — carry much of the instruction that tells tissues how to grow, take shape, and repair. Electricity, here, is a channel through which information travels.

A second system is biochemical: the hormones, neurotransmitters, and immune signals by which one part of the body communicates with another — and genetics, the chemical encoding of information itself. These molecules are not static, but vibrate at characteristic frequencies. Here, chemistry is the information channel.

A third proposed channel is light. Every living cell emits a faint glow — a few photons at a time, well below the threshold of vision, but real and measurable. Fritz-Albert Popp proposed that this light is coherent, like a laser’s, and that cells use it to communicate. Here the channel is photonic.

The common thread is this: the body is intricately woven together, constantly passing information between its parts — and with the world around it — along many different channels at once.

Is it possible to interface with the body on this informational level? This is what bioresonance sets out to do through the principle of resonance. If one vibrating tuning fork can induce a hum in another one across a room we can deduce that they are tuned to the same frequency. In the same way, the premise of bioresonance is that we can glean information about the state of the body by measuring what it resonates with. And because the body is not a passive thing like a tuning fork, but an adaptive, self-regulating system, bioresonance proposes a further possibility: that signals sent to the body might prompt it to adjust, supporting its own self-correction where regulation has faltered.

This field has been in development for the better part of a century. German physician Reinhold Voll found in the 1950s that acupuncture points had distinctive electrical characteristics and developed devices to measure these. He found that deviations from the norm could be informative about the body’s state. Later refinements streamlined the measuring process and added the ability to place a test substance, or informational stand-in for it, into the measuring loop, to test the body’s response to this. The latest iteration in this lineage of devices, developed in Soviet Russia from the 1980s, goes further still: through the use of diode transceivers, a computerised device puts a sequence of signals to the body and registers its responses, comparing them against an extensive reference database in minutes. Signals can also be transmitted to the body with the aim of supporting its regulation. Some of these devices have received European medical certification.

I believe that the more perspectives from which I can consider a patient, the better. So I don’t use bioresonance as a diagnostic method, but as one source of potentially useful information among several. Where the different perspectives corroborate one another, we are probably on more solid ground; where they contradict each other, we should de-emphasise those findings. Through this process of investigation, the details of a case crystallise into an ever more defined picture.

In my own practice I have found the therapeutic side of bioresonance a useful addition, and where I think it appropriate we can discuss whether it might have something to offer you.

I find the history, theory, and proposed mechanisms of bioresonance fascinating. But the question that ultimately matters is not whether the theory is sound — rather it is whether the modality has value for you as a patient. So while I explore and try to understand the theory, I hold it tentatively, and remind myself this question is secondary. The most direct way to answer the primary one is to put bioresonance to the test — and that is my invitation to you.

The next step is a consultation — book one here, or get in touch with any questions first.